Pensions - Articles - What the Chancellor didn't say - Budget 2013


A signal of future policy intention?

 Colin Richardson, Senior Corporate Consulting Actuary, provides additional views on the Budget from Buck Consultants:

 “This Budget was as much about what he didn’t do as what he did do. The retention of a 2% per annum inflation target is significant as to have changed to a nominal GDP target would have been a major blow to all who will have fixed incomes in retirement in any type of pension scheme. Furthermore, the pressure to reduce tax relief on pensions was extreme due to economic circumstances and to have not done so could be taken as a signal of future policy intention in this Parliament, as there will never be more pressure than now.

 “However, it wasn’t good news for annuity rates - giving the green light to further Quantitative Easing will do them no favours.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

TPRs oversight of largest DC schemes is evolving
Master trusts, some of the UK’s biggest defined contribution (DC) schemes, will be supervised differently to identify market and saver risks sooner an
Pension disengagement may cost you GBP500k in retirement
Failing to actively engage with pensions during one’s working life could have a staggering financial impact, according to a new report from PensionBee
Ongoing confusion over IHT proposals and pension priorities
Sacker & Partners LLP (Sackers), the UK’s leading specialist law firm for pensions and retirement savings, today announced the results of their most r

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.