Pensions - Articles - What the Chancellor didn't say - Budget 2013


A signal of future policy intention?

 Colin Richardson, Senior Corporate Consulting Actuary, provides additional views on the Budget from Buck Consultants:

 “This Budget was as much about what he didn’t do as what he did do. The retention of a 2% per annum inflation target is significant as to have changed to a nominal GDP target would have been a major blow to all who will have fixed incomes in retirement in any type of pension scheme. Furthermore, the pressure to reduce tax relief on pensions was extreme due to economic circumstances and to have not done so could be taken as a signal of future policy intention in this Parliament, as there will never be more pressure than now.

 “However, it wasn’t good news for annuity rates - giving the green light to further Quantitative Easing will do them no favours.”
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

FCA propose new interactive digital pension planning tools
Alongside targeted support proposals, the FCA also launched a Consultation Paper containing a package of proposals to help consumers navigate their fi
Building resilience in derisking strategies for DC members
The traditional model of derisking defined contribution (DC) pension schemes into default investment strategies is increasingly out of step with how t
7% of employers see salary sacrifice change making an impact
30% of schemes currently pass some or all of NIC savings to members. 13% of schemes believe it’s highly likely they will need to review current pensio

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.