Pensions - Articles - Why small pots are a big problem


According to government estimates, by 2050 there could be over 50 million pension pots virtually lost in the UK pensions system. That’s more than one for every working age person. This predicted surge in lost pots is down to two related factors. Firstly, our increasingly complex career paths already mean the majority of people work for many different organisations over their working lives – and thus might have pensions with multiple employers.

 By Dale Critchley, Technical Reform Manager, Corporate Benefits - Friends Life, part of the Aviva Group
  Secondly, with the arrival of auto-enrolment, this trend will increase: even relatively short-lived jobs might lead to a new pension pot being created.
  
 Even if an employee does trace all their individual pots down, the outcome can be far from satisfactory. Ten different pots on ten different systems are not only difficult to manage but they make it difficult to get full picture of what to expect in retirement, and thus do not help to engage employees with their pension savings. They also make it harder to obtain best value retirement income products.
  
 It’s not just employees who struggle. From the administrative perspective, small pots are inefficient, and reuniting individual savers with a long-lost pot can take a good deal of time and effort.
  
 Following extensive consultation, DWP has concluded that the most effective remedy to this challenge would be to introduce a “pot follows member” model.
  
 Under this scheme, whenever a new member is added to a pension scheme, the provider must check a series of databases to ascertain whether the member has an old pot of less than £10,000 left behind in a previous qualifying pension scheme. If they find one, they should arrange to transfer the small pot into the new scheme. Initially the transfer will only take place with the member’s explicit agreement, but it is proposed that this becomes an “opt-out” arrangement in the future, where the default approach is an automatic transfer.
  
 In theory, this sounds a win-win scenario: the member has a larger pot and fewer hassles; the challenge of small scheme administration is reduced and larger pots may mean greater employee engagement with their savings.
  
 Yet on closer inspection it’s not so clear-cut. The current transfer process is costly and inefficient, especially for smaller schemes that do not use electronic messaging systems. Security of data and the potential for fraud are also big issues, with the latter representing a major driver of the opt-in approach that will be adopted at outset.
  
 The focus to date has been on finding the most efficient solution to the problem. But perhaps it’s worth looking at the challenge from a different angle.
  
 A pension dashboard - a central repository for pension information - which can return a full picture of an individual’s pension provision from the input of a few personal details may be the answer.
  
 The FCA put forward the idea of a dashboard as a spin-off from the pot follows member database, but maybe the dashboard approach should lead the way in providing an answer to the engagement problem, and a building block towards physical pot aggregation.
  

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Wish list for the occupational pensions industry in 2025
As one year closes and another begins, it's an opportune moment to set our sights on the future. The UK occupational pensions industry faces nume
PSIG announces outcome of Consultation
The Pensions Scams Industry Group (PSIG), which was established in 2014 to help protect pension scheme members from scams, today announced the feedbac
Transfer values fell to a 12 month low during November
XPS Group’s Transfer Value Index reached a 12-month low, dropping to £151,000 during November 2024 before then recovering to its previous month-end po

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.