Pensions - Articles - Work and Pensions Committee call to scrap triple lock


Steven Cameron, Pensions Director at Aegon said: "The government will no doubt need to review the future of the triple lock beyond the next General Election as it seeks to deliver fair policies between generations.

 Those who are already in retirement have seen their income after housing costs almost catch up with those of working age largely because of generous final salary pension scheme they built up in the past but also helped by recent above inflation increases in the state pension as a result of the triple lock.

 However the Government must not set long term pension policy on the basis of those currently in retirement as those retiring in future are much less likely to match the incomes of current pensioners. The state pension remains the bedrock of many people's income in retirement and pensioners must be given some stability over its future level . We believe any government should commit to state pension increases for its 5 year period in power with intentions set out in pre-election manifestos.” 

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Funding for DB schemes makes more progress at start of 2026
Fully hedged scheme sees small funding level increase over January50% hedged scheme also improves position over the monthEncouraging start to 2026 fol
Older retirees lose out falling into best/worst income gap
Older retirees have most to lose by falling into the best/worst income gap, Just Group analysis reveals·Gap between the best and worst annuity rates i
Beazley agree £8bn Zurich buyout as Iran tensions dominate
FTSE 100 scales fresh heights as its defensive qualities shine. Energy stocks and miners benefit as Middle East tensions rise. Insurer Beazley agrees

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.