Investment - Articles - JP Morgans claim against Frank on grounds of fraud


JP Morgan has announced today that it is to make a claim on its Representations and Warranties insurance over the failed $175m acquisition of Frank, and the claim will be on the basis of fraud. Rowan Bamford, President at Liberty GTS, one of the largest global mergers and acquisitions (M&A) insurance teams in the industry, comments on what this means for all parties:

 “The insurance claim that JP Morgan has announced today against Frank, the business it bought for $175m and subsequently shut down in late 2022 amid mutual acrimony, is highly unusual, and completely changes the picture for the players involved, including Charlie Javice, founder of Frank.
 
 “It is not uncommon, of course, for insurance claims to be made on M&A insurances (known as Representations and Warranties in the US) some time after a deal has closed. However, the vast majority of claims we see are brought on the grounds of breaches of contractual warranty, and very few involve allegations of fraud. The claimant may think that their seller was less than honest in disclosing, for example, details of sales contracts, pending lawsuits or tax liabilities, but the claim is pursued as a breach of the warranty, simply because it is very difficult to prove fraud. However, when a fraud claim is brought it will almost certainly be dramatic, stressful and can lead to large losses for the seller of the company involved, if proven.
 
 “There are also significant implications for the Frank management team. A fraud claim allows the insurer, should the claim be paid out, to try and recoup their own costs by suing the individuals who formerly owned and ran the company or who are seen as responsible for the fraud. The implication of JP Morgan claiming this on the basis of fraud therefore opens up the possibility of Frank’s company founder, Charlie Javice becoming personally subject to a claim for the huge losses and costs that JP Morgan have incurred.”
 
 “Liberty GTS is not one of the insurers involved in this case, but we believe it does highlight both the risks involved in toxic M&A fallout for individuals, and also the importance for major M&A players like JP Morgan of taking cover on each of their deals. Through making this claim JP Morgan is now able to open up the possibility of both recouping some of its losses, and, without having to take legal action itself, inflicting significant financial and legal consequences on the executives who they believe cheated them on the Frank deal.”

   

Back to Index


Similar News to this Story

Inheritance Tax raises almost GBP6 billion in 8 months
December’s update from HMRC shows that Inheritance Tax (IHT) receipts reached £5.7 billion through the first two-thirds of this financial year (April
PIC completes first Mosaic buyin with GCB Pension Fund
Pension Insurance Corporation plc (“PIC”) has concluded its first full scheme buy-in within Mosaic, PIC’s streamlined service for pension schemes with
Airways Pension Scheme complete longevity hedge with MetLife
The Trustees of the Airways Pension Scheme (“the Scheme”), Metropolitan Tower Life Insurance Company, a subsidiary of MetLife, Inc., (“MetLife”) and Z

Site Search

Exact   Any  

Latest Actuarial Jobs

Actuarial Login

Email
Password
 Jobseeker    Client
Reminder Logon

APA Sponsors

Actuarial Jobs & News Feeds

Jobs RSS News RSS

WikiActuary

Be the first to contribute to our definitive actuarial reference forum. Built by actuaries for actuaries.