 |
|
|
| View More Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Head of Pricing | ||
| London - £170,000 Per Annum | ||
| Pricing Actuary | ||
| London - £120,000 Per Annum | ||
| Pricing Transformation Lead | ||
| London - £85,000 Per Annum | ||
| Head of Capital | ||
| London - Negotiable | ||
| Portfolio Actuary | ||
| London - £140,000 Per Annum | ||
| Deputy Head of Capital | ||
| London - £140,000 Per Annum | ||
| Senior Pricing & Portfolio Management... | ||
| London - £150,000 Per Annum | ||
| Pricing Transformation Lead | ||
| London - £85,000 Per Annum | ||
| Lead Capital Actuary | ||
| London - £150,000 Per Annum | ||
| Take the lead on capital oversight | ||
| London / hybrid 2 days p/w office-based - Negotiable | ||
| Be at the forefront of creative GI co... | ||
| London/hybrid 2-3dpw office-based - Negotiable | ||
| Remote Market and Credit Risk Calibra... | ||
| Remote - Negotiable | ||
| Contact us about a Capital Contract i... | ||
| London / hybrid 2 days p/w office-based - Negotiable | ||
| Head of Insurance Risk | ||
| London - £160,000 Per Annum | ||
| Director - Pensions Risk Transfer (PRT) | ||
| London, Midlands, North West - hybrid working 2dpw in the office - Negotiable | ||
| Dip a toe into public sector work wit... | ||
| Flex / hybrid 2 days p/w office-based - Negotiable | ||
| P&C Consultant | ||
| London / hybrid 3dpw office-based - Negotiable | ||
| Take the lead client-facing projects ... | ||
| Various locations - Negotiable | ||
| Choose Life! Choose a major global co... | ||
| Various locations - Negotiable | ||
| Actuarial skillset? Apply now for Snr... | ||
| South East / hybrid with travel requirements - Negotiable | ||
LATEST EDITION - OUT NOW
Copyright © 2026 Actuarial Post. Created by Zero-One Design Ltd
Recent geopolitical events have had wide ranging economic impacts, including for defined benefit (DB) pension schemes, with many trustees navigating a period of significant uncertainty about how much their employer covenant will be impacted. However, at the same time they are being asked to reach increasingly firm views on key aspects of their covenant for the new DB funding regime. So how can trustees decide how reliable their covenant is when so much is uncertain?
I started my actuarial career in South Africa in the early 1990s, a time of change in both politics and pensions. 1994 heralded the first democratic elections in South Africa’s history but it also took place at a time when the defined benefit (DB) pensions landscape was undergoing a profound transition. Final salary schemes were closing at pace, and employers were transferring liabilities to insurance companies. Defined contribution (DC) pensions were on the rise, and with them, came a steady shift of risk away from employers and towards individual members.
.jpg "The Real Risk in Life Modernisation Image")
Life insurance is approaching a major transformation cycle. For decades, the sector has operated on highly stable, transaction-intensive platforms. Many of those systems are now reaching end of life. The engineers who built them have retired. The languages they were written in are increasingly rare. Maintenance costs are rising. Regulatory risk is growing and replacement is no longer optional. The question is not whether to modernise. It is how.